ComparePlungeFind my match

BlueCube C3 vs Plunge All-In (Gen 2)

The quick verdict

The BlueCube C3 leads on water capacity (110 gal vs 75 gal), lowest temperature (36°F vs 37°F) and chiller power (1 HP vs 0.9 HP). Only the BlueCube C3 offers UV Sanitation. Only the Plunge All-In (Gen 2) offers Heat / Hot-Tub Mode and App Control.

Choose the BlueCube C3 if…

  • You want the better water capacity (110 gal vs 75 gal)
  • You want the better lowest temperature (36°F vs 37°F)
  • You need UV Sanitation

Choose the Plunge All-In (Gen 2) if…

  • You need Heat / Hot-Tub Mode
  • You need App Control

Full spec comparison

Specification
BlueCube C3

BlueCube

BlueCube C3

Check price
Plunge All-In (Gen 2)

Plunge

Plunge All-In (Gen 2)

Check price
Essentials
Price$4,990
TypeAll-in-one tubAll-in-one tub
Water Capacity110 gal75 gal
Temperature
Lowest Temperature36°F37°F
Highest Temperature104°F
Chiller Included
Chiller Power1 HP0.9 HP
Heat / Hot-Tub Mode
Water Quality
Filtration
Ozone Sanitation
UV Sanitation
Convenience
App Control
Portable / Packable
PlacementIndoor / outdoorIndoor / outdoor
Insulated
Build & Warranty
MaterialComposite, wood-panel optionsAcrylic over fiberglass
Footprint73" × 49" (66" tub)68" × 32"
WarrantyCommercial-grade1 year (extendable)

Frequently asked questions

What does the BlueCube C3 have that the Plunge All-In (Gen 2) doesn't?

The BlueCube C3 offers UV Sanitation, which the Plunge All-In (Gen 2) lacks.

What does the Plunge All-In (Gen 2) have that the BlueCube C3 doesn't?

The Plunge All-In (Gen 2) offers Heat / Hot-Tub Mode and App Control, which the BlueCube C3 lacks.

Should I buy the BlueCube C3 or the Plunge All-In (Gen 2)?

It depends on your priorities. The BlueCube C3 leads on water capacity (110 gal vs 75 gal), lowest temperature (36°F vs 37°F) and chiller power (1 HP vs 0.9 HP). Only the BlueCube C3 offers UV Sanitation. Only the Plunge All-In (Gen 2) offers Heat / Hot-Tub Mode and App Control.

Verdicts on this page are generated from the manufacturer-published specifications in the table above. See our methodology.